Index / Comparisons Last reviewed · October 15, 2026
Viva vs H3 Max Director Compare two prompt-directed streaming options by controls, access, hourly rates, and billing basis.
Viva lists active-stream billing; Director lists generated-output billing. Review chunk controls and session behavior in the linked specifications, then measure cost for the same workflow. Neither entry has verified Elo in this index.
Prompt-directed video and audio with image inputs and configurable chunks.
Provider Sequencer Category Continuous video Published rate $40.00 /hr Active stream time Billing basis Active stream time Resolution 1344 × 768 Frame rate 24 fps output Access Hosted API · request access Verified video Elo Not rated Controls Live prompts Image input Frame reset Variable chunks Audience voting Live H3 Max direction with prompt memory, scene beats, and streamed playback.
Provider fal Category Continuous video Published rate $288.00 /hr Generated video · 768p Billing basis Generated video output duration; minimum 1/60 output hour per started session Resolution 768p; 1080p option Frame rate Not published Access Public API Verified video Elo Not rated Controls Live prompts First / last frame Scene beats Audio queue WebRTC playback What to test Test the same sequence of prompt and reference-image changes. Record chunk duration, time to first playback, stalls, and total usable output. Calculate active-stream hours and generated-output hours separately. Specifications above are sourced claims. World Model Index has not run an original head-to-head benchmark for this pair.
Evaluation checklist · Cost calculators · Open interactive comparison
Official sources Viva H3 Max Director 
World Model Index
Viva